Question 43
NECO_MODEL_QUESTIONS_VOL1
•
2018
•
ENGLISH_LANGUAGE
•
objective
Some argue that school uniforms suppress individuality, while others claim they promote equality. Write a concise rebuttal (maximum 80 words) to the claim that school uniforms suppress individuality, and identify at least one logical fallacy in that claim.
Answer Options
A.
Because uniforms are mandatory, students lose all sense of self, making the school environment homogeneous. This is an example of an appeal to tradition.
Correct Answer
B.
While uniforms standardise dress, they do not erase personal identity; students still differentiate themselves through hairstyles, accessories, speech, and achievements. The argument overlooks these avenues, making a hasty generalisation that clothing alone defines individuality.
C.
Uniforms completely eliminate any chance for personal expression, as students cannot modify their appearance at all. This demonstrates a slippery‑slip argument that overstates the impact of dress codes.
D.
While uniforms may limit some fashion choices, they actually enhance individuality by allowing students to express themselves through academic performance and extracurricular activities. The claim that clothing alone suppresses individuality is a false dilemma.
Correct Answer
B
Correct Option:
While uniforms standardise dress, they do not erase personal identity; students still differentiate themselves through hairstyles, accessories, speech, and achievements. The argument overlooks these avenues, making a hasty generalisation that clothing alone defines individuality.
About This Question
This is
Neco Model Questions Vol1
2018
English Language
Question 43.
It is one of the
objective
questions from the
2018
Neco Model Questions Vol1
English Language
examination.
Difficulty level:
Hard
.