Question 16
NECO_MODEL_QUESTIONS_VOL1
•
2022
•
ENGLISH_LANGUAGE
•
objective
You are asked to write an argumentative essay on the statement: "Mobile phones should be banned in secondary schools." Decide which side you will argue, present at least three supporting points, address a counter‑argument, and conclude with a strong closing statement.
Answer Options
Correct Answer
A.
Sample essay (pro‑ban):\n\nIntroduction: State the thesis that mobile phones should be banned in secondary schools because they distract learning, facilitate cheating, and expose students to cyber‑bullying.\n\nBody Paragraph 1: Distraction - phones interrupt lessons, reducing concentration and academic performance.\nBody Paragraph 2: Cheating - easy access to internet enables plagiarism during exams.\nBody Paragraph 3: Cyber‑bullying - constant connectivity increases harassment incidents.\n\nCounter‑argument: Some argue phones are essential for emergencies; rebuttal: schools can provide a central communication system for emergencies, eliminating the need for personal devices.\n\nConclusion: Re‑affirm that banning phones creates a safer, more focused learning environment and prepares students for disciplined study habits.
B.
Sample essay (pro‑ban, but flawed):
Introduction: Argue that mobile phones should be banned because they are expensive, cause battery hazards, and increase screen time.
Body Paragraph 1: Cost - phones are a financial burden for families.
Body Paragraph 2: Safety - batteries can explode in lockers.
Body Paragraph 3: Health - excessive screen exposure harms eyesight.
Counter‑argument: Some say phones are useful for research; rebuttal: libraries already provide computers.
Conclusion: Banning phones will save money and keep students safe.
C.
Sample essay (pro‑ban, missing counter‑argument):
Introduction: State that mobile phones must be banned to improve discipline.
Body Paragraph 1: Distraction - phones interrupt lessons.
Body Paragraph 2: Cheating - easy access to answers.
Body Paragraph 3: Social pressure - students feel compelled to own the latest model.
Conclusion: Without phones, schools will foster a more focused and equitable environment.
D.
Sample essay (anti‑ban):
Introduction: State the thesis that mobile phones should be allowed in secondary schools because they enhance learning, improve communication, and develop digital skills.
Body Paragraph 1: Learning tool - smartphones provide access to educational apps and instant information.
Body Paragraph 2: Communication - students can contact parents quickly in emergencies.
Body Paragraph 3: Digital literacy - regular use prepares students for the modern workforce.
Counter‑argument: Some claim phones cause distraction; rebuttal: teachers can enforce strict usage policies during class time.
Conclusion: Re‑affirm that integrating phones into the classroom enriches education and prepares students for future challenges.
Correct Answer
A
Correct Option:
Sample essay (pro‑ban):\n\nIntroduction: State the thesis that mobile phones should be banned in secondary schools because they distract learning, facilitate cheating, and expose students to cyber‑bullying.\n\nBody Paragraph 1: Distraction - phones interrupt lessons, reducing concentration and academic performance.\nBody Paragraph 2: Cheating - easy access to internet enables plagiarism during exams.\nBody Paragraph 3: Cyber‑bullying - constant connectivity increases harassment incidents.\n\nCounter‑argument: Some argue phones are essential for emergencies; rebuttal: schools can provide a central communication system for emergencies, eliminating the need for personal devices.\n\nConclusion: Re‑affirm that banning phones creates a safer, more focused learning environment and prepares students for disciplined study habits.
About This Question
This is
Neco Model Questions Vol1
2022
English Language
Question 16.
It is one of the
objective
questions from the
2022
Neco Model Questions Vol1
English Language
examination.
Difficulty level:
Medium
.