Neco 2025 Civic Education Question 35

Practice objective / multiple choice question 35 from the 2025 Neco Civic Education examination.

Neco 2025 Civic Education Objective / Multiple Choice Medium Difficulty
Question 35 NECO • 2025 • CIVIC_EDUCATION • objective

Parliament passes a law imposing a mandatory death penalty for the offence of theft. The Constitution guarantees the right to life and protection against inhuman or degrading treatment. Analyze whether the new law is consistent with the rule of law and constitutional supremacy, and indicate the appropriate legal remedy that can be pursued to challenge the law.

Answer Options

A. The law is constitutional because it pursues a legitimate public interest in preventing theft; it should be upheld by the judiciary.
B. The law is unconstitutional only due to a breach of procedural fairness; it can be remedied by legislative amendment rather than judicial strike‑down.
C. The law is valid under the doctrine of parliamentary supremacy; no constitutional challenge is permissible.
Correct Answer D. The law is unconstitutional because it violates the right to life and the ban on inhuman punishment; it must be struck down via a constitutional challenge in court.
Correct Answer
D
Correct Option:
The law is unconstitutional because it violates the right to life and the ban on inhuman punishment; it must be struck down via a constitutional challenge in court.

About This Question

This is Neco 2025 Civic Education Question 35. It is one of the objective questions from the 2025 Neco Civic Education examination.

Difficulty level: Medium .

View More Neco 2025 Civic Education Questions More Neco Practice Questions Back to Questions

Master the Exam!

You've seen a preview, but there are thousands more questions plus AI tutor to break down complex solutions.

Unlock Full Access Available for Android & Windows
Chat with Support