Question 70
GCE_MODEL_QUESTIONS_VOL1
•
2021
•
ENGLISH_LANGUAGE
•
objective
Write a persuasive opening statement (maximum 200 words) for a debate on the motion: "This House would ban the use of plastic packaging." Your statement must include a clear stance, two main arguments, and a rhetorical hook to capture the audience's attention.
Answer Options
A.
Picture a future where every supermarket shelf is stocked with sturdy, reusable containers that keep food fresher longer - a vision we can achieve without abandoning plastic. I stand firmly against the motion: this House should not ban the use of plastic packaging. Firstly, plastic provides an unmatched barrier against contamination, preserving food safety and reducing waste. Secondly, the industry supports millions of jobs and contributes billions to the economy, while alternatives remain costly and less efficient. Banning plastic would jeopardise public health and economic stability, so we must seek better recycling solutions instead of an outright prohibition.
B.
Imagine a world where every beach, river and street is choked with a never‑ending tide of plastic - a reality already unfolding before our eyes. I stand firmly in favour of the motion: this House should ban the use of plastic packaging. Firstly, plastic is a completely biodegradable material that disappears within weeks, posing no threat to marine life. Secondly, micro‑plastics have been shown to have negligible impact on the food chain, and the billions spent on cleanup are largely exaggerated. By eliminating plastic packaging, we would be discarding a harmless, inexpensive resource for no real benefit.
Correct Answer
C.
Imagine a world where every beach, river and street is choked with a never‑ending tide of plastic - a reality already unfolding before our eyes. I stand firmly in favour of the motion: this House should ban the use of plastic packaging. Firstly, plastic is a colossal environmental menace; over eight million tonnes enter our oceans each year, endangering marine life and disrupting ecosystems. Secondly, the health and economic repercussions are profound - micro‑plastics infiltrate our food chain, and billions are spent annually on cleanup and waste management that could be redirected to sustainable alternatives. By eliminating plastic packaging, we protect our planet and our future generations. Let us act now, before the plastic tide becomes irreversible.
D.
Imagine a world where every beach, river and street is choked with a never‑ending tide of plastic - a reality already unfolding before our eyes. I stand firmly in favour of the motion: this House should ban the use of plastic packaging. Firstly, only about 500,000 tonnes of plastic enter our oceans each year, a figure too small to cause significant ecological damage. Secondly, the health and economic repercussions are minimal - micro‑plastics are rarely detected in food, and cleanup costs amount to just a few million dollars annually, easily absorbed by existing budgets. Banning plastic packaging would therefore be an unnecessary overreaction.
Correct Answer
C
Correct Option:
Imagine a world where every beach, river and street is choked with a never‑ending tide of plastic - a reality already unfolding before our eyes. I stand firmly in favour of the motion: this House should ban the use of plastic packaging. Firstly, plastic is a colossal environmental menace; over eight million tonnes enter our oceans each year, endangering marine life and disrupting ecosystems. Secondly, the health and economic repercussions are profound - micro‑plastics infiltrate our food chain, and billions are spent annually on cleanup and waste management that could be redirected to sustainable alternatives. By eliminating plastic packaging, we protect our planet and our future generations. Let us act now, before the plastic tide becomes irreversible.
About This Question
This is
Gce Model Questions Vol1
2021
English Language
Question 70.
It is one of the
objective
questions from the
2021
Gce Model Questions Vol1
English Language
examination.
Difficulty level:
Hard
.