Post Utme Wellspring University 2025 English Question 27

Practice objective / multiple choice question 27 from the 2025 Post Utme Wellspring University English examination.

Post Utme Wellspring University 2025 English Objective / Multiple Choice
Question 27 POST_UTME_WELLSPRING_UNIVERSITY • 2025 • ENGLISH • objective

The lawyer's argument was based on the principle of "res ipsa loquitur," which holds that an accident can be inferred from the mere fact that it occurred, without the need for direct evidence of negligence. However, the judge countered that this principle is only applicable in cases where the accident is of a type that would not normally occur in the absence of negligence. Which of the following best describes the judge's argument?

Answer Options

A. The judge is arguing that the principle of res ipsa loquitur is never applicable.
B. The judge is arguing that the principle of res ipsa loquitur is only applicable in cases where the accident is of a type that would normally occur in the absence of negligence.
Correct Answer C. The judge is arguing that the principle of res ipsa loquitur is only applicable in cases where the accident is of a type that would not normally occur in the absence of negligence.
D. The judge is arguing that the principle of res ipsa loquitur is only applicable in cases where the accident is of a type that would normally occur in the presence of negligence.
Correct Answer
C
Correct Option:
The judge is arguing that the principle of res ipsa loquitur is only applicable in cases where the accident is of a type that would not normally occur in the absence of negligence.

About This Question

This is Post Utme Wellspring University 2025 English Question 27. It is one of the objective questions from the 2025 Post Utme Wellspring University English examination.

Master the Exam!

You've seen a preview, but there are thousands more questions plus AI tutor to break down complex solutions.

Unlock Full Access Available for Android & Windows
Chat with Support