Post Utme Wellspring University 2021 English Question 28

Practice objective / multiple choice question 28 from the 2021 Post Utme Wellspring University English examination.

Post Utme Wellspring University 2021 English Objective / Multiple Choice
Question 28 POST_UTME_WELLSPRING_UNIVERSITY • 2021 • ENGLISH • objective

The lawyer's argument was based on the principle of "res ipsa loquitur," which holds that an accident can be inferred from the mere fact that it occurred, without the need for further evidence. However, the judge countered that this principle is not applicable in cases where the accident was caused by a third party. Which of the following best describes the lawyer's argument?

Answer Options

A. The lawyer argued that the accident was caused by a third party.
Correct Answer B. The lawyer argued that the principle of res ipsa loquitur is not applicable in this case.
C. The lawyer argued that the accident was caused by a combination of factors.
D. The lawyer argued that the principle of res ipsa loquitur is always applicable in cases of accidents.
Correct Answer
B
Correct Option:
The lawyer argued that the principle of res ipsa loquitur is not applicable in this case.

About This Question

This is Post Utme Wellspring University 2021 English Question 28. It is one of the objective questions from the 2021 Post Utme Wellspring University English examination.

View More Post Utme Wellspring University 2021 English Questions More Post Utme Wellspring University Practice Questions Back to Questions

Master the Exam!

You've seen a preview, but there are thousands more questions plus AI tutor to break down complex solutions.

Unlock Full Access Available for Android & Windows
Chat with Support