Question 21
POST_UTME_VERITAS_UNIVERSITY
•
2020
•
ENGLISH
•
objective
The lawyer's argument was based on the principle of "res ipsa loquitur," which means that the injury was so "obvious" that it spoke for itself. The judge was impressed by the lawyer's use of this "legal maxim," which is a "phrase" that is commonly used in law.
Answer Options
A.
The lawyer's argument was based on the principle of "res ipsa loquitur," which means that the injury was so "obvious" that it spoke for itself.
B.
The judge was impressed by the lawyer's use of this "legal maxim," which is a "phrase" that is commonly used in law.
Correct Answer
C.
The lawyer's argument was based on the principle of "res ipsa loquitur," which means that the injury was so "obvious" that it spoke for itself, and the judge was impressed by the lawyer's use of this "legal maxim," which is a "phrase" that is commonly used in law.
D.
The lawyer's argument was based on the principle of "res ipsa loquitur," which means that the injury was so "obvious" that it spoke for itself, and the judge was impressed by the lawyer's use of this "legal maxim," which is a "phrase" that is commonly used in law, but the lawyer's argument was not based on this principle.
Correct Answer
C
Correct Option:
The lawyer's argument was based on the principle of "res ipsa loquitur," which means that the injury was so "obvious" that it spoke for itself, and the judge was impressed by the lawyer's use of this "legal maxim," which is a "phrase" that is commonly used in law.
About This Question
This is
Post Utme Veritas University
2020
English
Question 21.
It is one of the
objective
questions from the
2020
Post Utme Veritas University
English
examination.