Post Utme Unilorin 2017 Commerce Question 31

Practice objective / multiple choice question 31 from the 2017 Post Utme Unilorin Commerce examination.

Post Utme Unilorin 2017 Commerce Objective / Multiple Choice
Question 31 POST_UTME_UNILORIN • 2017 • COMMERCE • objective

A company is sued for violating the Consumer Protection Act. The company's defense is that the consumer failed to read the fine print on the contract. However, the consumer claims that the fine print was not conspicuous and that the company should have taken reasonable steps to ensure that the consumer understood the terms of the contract. Which of the following is the most likely outcome of this case?

Answer Options

A. The court will rule in favor of the company because the consumer failed to read the fine print.
Correct Answer B. The court will rule in favor of the consumer because the company failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that the consumer understood the terms of the contract.
C. The court will rule that the Consumer Protection Act does not apply in this case because the consumer is a business.
D. The court will rule that the Consumer Protection Act does not apply in this case because the contract was signed voluntarily.
Correct Answer
B
Correct Option:
The court will rule in favor of the consumer because the company failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that the consumer understood the terms of the contract.

About This Question

This is Post Utme Unilorin 2017 Commerce Question 31. It is one of the objective questions from the 2017 Post Utme Unilorin Commerce examination.

View More Post Utme Unilorin 2017 Commerce Questions More Post Utme Unilorin Practice Questions Back to Questions

Master the Exam!

You've seen a preview, but there are thousands more questions plus AI tutor to break down complex solutions.

Unlock Full Access Available for Android & Windows
Chat with Support